Report Officially Recommends Closing Nesconset Elementary
School closing decision to be made by Board of Education at the end of the month.
The Citizens Advisory Committee on Thursday night officially targeted closing Nesconset Elementary School as one of five recommendations to save the Smithtown Central School District money.
The committee spoke to the board and district administration for roughly an hour-and-a-half outlining the process of how the recommendations were developed over their 19 meetings. In addition to the presentation, a 33-page form of the 239 page report, which is available on the district’s website, was distributed to the public at Thursday’s meeting.
The five recommendations of the committee include closing Nesconset Elementary to save the district an estimated $960,000, foregoing the Princeton Plan that would move students group students in schools by kindergarten to second grade and grades three through five, renting and not selling the vacant building school, relocating central offices if the district could benefit financially from the move, and studying the sale of vacant or undeveloped district land.
The board is expected to make its decision on Feb. 28.
“I know that the teachers and administrators will make it work, the parents will make it work, but I know it’s going to be very difficult,” said board member Joanne McEnroy after the meeting.
McEnroy said she has not made a decision on a school closing and will review the committee’s report and community input during the public hearing on Feb. 15.
Board member Grace Plourde said she needed to digest the data from the committee and absorb the community responses from the public hearing before making a decision.
One board member said he is ready to vote based on the committee’s work.
“I’ve said publically that I’m going to go with the recommendation because they’ve [CAC] done all the homework, countless hours … it must have been 1,000 hours. We could have never done that here,” said board member Joseph Saggese.
Saggese also said that he’s been through school closings and moves as a parent in the district and that although it was difficult at times he and his family got through it.
“My son went to East [and] then he went to West … my son stayed at West because he was a senior and my daughter went to East because she was a sophomore so they were split up. My other kids went from Dogwood to St. James so there was disruption but we got through it. Kids get through it, parents get through it,” he said.
The report details enrollment projections, the impact on special education and special services, transition recommendations and long-range considerations and more for the district.
A hearing for the community to speak out about the report and possible school closing is set for Feb. 15 in the auditorium at Nesaquake Middle School. The board will have a work session following the public hearing on Feb. 16 in the Joseph Barton Building on New York Avenue and will make a decision Feb. 28.
robkoz
6:12 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
Let me get this straight here so we're all clear: The school will close to save money, school taxes will go up once again next year like it always does, the teachers and administrators will still get their raises and benefits. Did I miss anything?
Ken Heard
1:10 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
To the public relations gurus. You can put lipstick on a hog, but it remains a hog.What gets cannabalized next year to cover ever growing salaries and expenses ? Where are the union givebacks ?
3SJ
9:18 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
If the Board goes with the CACIH recommendation, all of Mills Pond Elementary students will be affected. With 55% going to Saint James Elementary then feeding into Nesaquake Middle school and the other 45 % staying at Mills Pond Elementary then relocating to another town to Great Hollow Middle school. Great Hollow then splits into East and West High Schools. Mills Pond children are the ones losing. They are losing their friends, and now being torn from the St. James community. St. James students SHOULD go to St. James schools...meaning...Nesaquake Middle School!! Siblings will be split because of this. There will be a sibling grandfathered into Nesaquake while younger siblings will be fed into Great Hollow. How is that saving any money having 2 buses coming through the same town for two different Middle Schools? This is ludicrous! Mills Pond should become a 'split' elementary and have Nesconset children go to their home Middle school, while St. James students go to their home Middle school. Why isn't anyone seeing this problem???
Ken Heard
10:28 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
@ Mills Pond Mom. Your analysis is both detailed and worthy of consideration. But you dealing with an autocratic bureaucracy that is accountable to no one. Fight the good fight but you are still going to lose.
If your assumptions are correct, then transportation costs will spike. I found a similar flaw in the Princeton Plan, when I cited that the bus company would receive
$ 11 million dollars in additional revenue over the next 10 years if this plan were implemented.
CAC recommendation aside, the board can still implement the Princeton Plan and cost this town millions in added transportation costs. The board is not bound by CAC recommendations.
The key appears to be increased transportation costs. How much will school bus expenses spike if the district shuffles Mills Pond , St James and Great Hollow students. Will the reshuffling lead to longer bus commutes , longer bus confinement, and a need for additional buses ?
You should e mail Carl MacGowan at Newsday as well as the Smithtown News and Smithtown Times. Let them know this is not a letter to the editor but a cry for help. You may still lose, but at least you would have fought the good fight.
Upset MPE Mom
9:37 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
@Mill Pond Mom, I am a MPE mom too and agree 100% with you! We have to make the board see this as a reasonable and fair solution by attending the next several meetings and making our voices heard.
3SJ
10:37 am on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Ken, thank you for the input. I will be affected by having 2 children in 2 different Middle Schools. I know I am not alone with that situation. I will send letters out to the press.
Judy Rathermoore
12:39 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
Nesconset Mom
I honestly feel that this is a short fix to a bigger problem. I have said this many time. Yes. I agree with the comment that this will impact other costs due to longer transportation routes, etc. AND The community will not necessarily be saving the amount that the CAC states ONCE YOU factor in the added costs due to the change!
The Board of Education really need to start from a zero budget and work its way up adding the essentials first. AND the board need to think of the long range plan not just the year to year planning.
Our taxes will not stay the same, even with this change.............so the bigger picture needs to be addressed........
St. James Mom
11:26 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
I would like to ask the board to seriously look at redistricting ALL the elementary schools. Patching the boundary lines each time a change is made has resulted in ridiculous school zones. (Seriously, look at the map) I believe it is done this way to impact the least amount of families however the adjustments previously made, no longer make sense and should be revised. If they just patch the boundaries again, then the kids furthest south that went to Nesconset may have to go all the way up, past 347 and the Mall to get to Mills Pond. The kids furthest east in St. James, end up going to Great Hollow, which again adds traffic over 347. By having all this school traffic crossing back and forth over 347 we just add to the traffic issues in our neighborhood. In addition, the added time on the bus adds both cost and safety issues.
If they don’t redistrict all the schools, the middle school boundaries should then be set geographically rather than by school. North of 347 – Nesaquake, South Great Hollow.
So listen up – Make the right decision and fix the boundary lines to reduce bus time, simplify bus routes, improve traffic in our community and keep our children safe. Do it right this time!
Ken Heard
11:44 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
@ St James Mom. Your observation is the same as Mills Pond Mom- Inefficient and costly use of school buses. I made the same observation regarding the Princeton Plan, which would have increased transportation costs by $11 million dollars over 10 years. Does the BOE own stock in the bus company?? How can make the same error over and over again?
My advice is the same that I gave to Mills Pond Mom. Contact Newsday, Smithtown News, Smithtown Times and , yes, even News 12. You don't need a forum.. You need help
St. James Mom
11:31 pm on Saturday, February 4, 2012
@Mills Pond Mom - Noone mentioned anything about grandfathering the current 7th graders. There is a good chance they will be split apart next year.
BillLongisland
6:26 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
On that subject of school buses and their special "personalized pick up policies", it must be nice for the to get the "personalized pick up service"...with All Of Those School Buses stopping at almost Every House, the "fuel efficiency stats", not counting the overtime for school bus drivers, must be Off The Charts !
But since it's Free Tax Payer Money, I guess the "Lib Environmental, Tree Hugging, Fanatics" don't care about that do they ?
MJH
9:32 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Bill, please explain the special personalized pick up policies. Who is getting this service?
Ken Heard
8:27 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
@ bill. A pattern of mismanagement is emerging regarding transportation costs. Mills Pond Mom and St James Mom noticed this as well as I a few months back re the Princeton Plan. This was the main reason given for tabling the Princeton Plan ( $11 million dollars in increased expenditures to the bus company over the next 10 years)
My advice is the same. Contact the NEWS, the TIMES, NEWSDAY, and NEWS 12..These local media outlets are the best way to get action. Good Luck.
MJH
9:35 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Ken, can you please give us your numbers regarding the 11 million if the modified Princeton Plan were to be implemented. I am just interested in the data that brings you to that number. Thanks so much.
Ken Heard
12:30 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
That's an increase of $1.1 million dollars per year for 10 years. The report said this cost would be offset by a " 30% return" each year starting in the second year of the plan's implementation. Upon closer analysis, this return is not a return at all, but state aid equal l to 30% of the $1.1. million dollar annual increase in transportation costs. This state aid is NOT GUARANTEED. And it was wrong to classify it as a "return" Shades of Bernie Madoff
Over a ten year period, the bus company would receive an extra $11 million dollars and the district may or may not receive $3.3 million dollars in state aid. One thing for sure- the students would have a longer bus commute and longer bus confinement.
Reference back issues of The Times and The News. Also note that this excess cost coupled with longer bus confinement and a longer commute was - in the end- the primary reason the CAC advised against the Princeton Plan.
BillLongisland
9:01 am on Sunday, February 5, 2012
I mean all you have to do is go to Patchogue and other villages and see that All of the money that's been "thrown" at these places has been looted...unfortunately there isn't much left to loot anymore, though our Local Craven Politicians are an inventive sort in that particular area of expertise.
SOWO parent
10:18 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
I am also a Mills Pond parent with transportation concerns. In addition to the concerns mentioned above, we must also factor in the construction creeping up 347. As it approaches this area, the main and back roads will be congested with traffic. I shudder to think how long my children will be on the bus due to that. Lets not forget that the bus times are staggered and used for different schools. If there is not enough time to complete a run in time for the next school start, you are talking about adding busses.
In addition, the Board would like the community to address them in a "non emotional" manner. I find this ironic as they speak very "emotionally" towards each other at Board meetings. I question whether their voting on some issues is based on emotion rather than impartial prudence.
Thirdly, I am concerned that if all goes according to recommendation, classes in the affected elementary schools will be more crowded than in the unaffected schools. I am wondering how the staffing savings presented by the CAC can be achieved without driving up class sizes. Even if a school closes, we have the same amount of students.
Lastly, I feel the St. James community is being sliced and diced and annexed as part of Nesconset. Nesconset is a great community, but I paid what I paid for my house to be part of St. James. The board should remember that the community members vote them in and therefore they should take the input from the community to heart.
Smithtown Rez
11:39 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
As a Nesconset resident (and formerly St. James) I promise not be offended by the "annexed" comment :). Snobby (and silly) statement, but I digress...
Realize that this has been a larger problem for more than just this moment. It is not right that at present children feed into Great Hollow and then get split into East/West. We never should have reopened Mills Pond in the first place. I would argue we should close Mills Pond and rezone St. James children to St. James wherever possible and do a complete redraw once and for all. But the moment they agreed to develop the overpriced gated community overlooking the Mall you essentially are handcuffed into keeping Mills Pond open. We are all looking at class size increases in light of the higher costs to the district and lower funding from the state. Redraw it once and for all to avoid this ever happening again.
One Opinion
12:37 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
I was sure that St James was part of the Smithtown school district and not the St James school district. The Nesconset students are coming to Mills Pond Elementary which is in St James. In a few years Nesconset will probably be closed so your kids will be at Great Hollow anyway. I think your comment about being "annexed as part of Nesconset" is small minded and snobby.
One Opinion
12:39 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Meant to say in a few years Nesaquake Middle School will be closed and those children will be going to Great Hollow anyway.
St James mom
10:20 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
I agree with Mills Pond mom. This is taring apart this community. St James children should stay in St James schools where they see children from religion, sports, church and community events. The same would go for Nesconsett students. With all the social problems (drugs, alcohol, increased suicides) we need to build the community bonds not break them up!! The 45% students who remain at MPE (especially the older grades who don't have time to establish stronger relationships with new children) will have 2 big splits. In Sept split from families they've known since preschool then make new friends in a middle school that splits again! What an injustice to these children. I agree though difficult and uncomfortable for some, if a school must close rezone the whole district. (and strongly consider MPE a split elementary at least for now)
Ken Heard
11:02 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
It is a struggle of community givebacks ( closed schools, longer and more expensive school bus rides,curtailed sports activities, etc) vs union givebacks (salaries, benefits, etc)The teachers union is winning. Through it all, they have sat on the sidelines and- even without a contract - still managed to get annual pay increases, thanks to the Triborough Amendment. This is a disgrace.
St James mom
11:39 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
I should have added if it's so important to move 100% of Nesconsett students together and not break them up, why is it fair to break the small population that remains at Mills Pond TWICE!!!! ? Does anyone else see how unfair this is? They are split from friends, siblings, familiar teachers (that older friends, siblings may have had).
St. James Mom
11:49 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
They need to redistrict ALL the schools fairly. My suggestion for the east side is north of 347 goes to Mills pond and St J El. Then Mills Pond feeds Nesequake and the families closer to Great Hollow can go to there.
One Opinion
12:22 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
In reading the CACIH final report it appears that the proposal presented is the best scenario. Enrollment is declining and will continie to drop. There is a case to close an elementary school. With the Nesconset students staying together and The St James students still attending two St James schools, I think it works out. Are there adjustments? Yes. But there will be more changes down the road. I have no doubt the district will be going down to two middle schools and one high school within the next few years.
There will always be changes.
It would be easier to accept closing a school if there were real savings to be had and that was translating into more opportunities for the students. Unforunately, any savings that the district can find goes to make payroll.
With that said, I am amazed at the outrage parents have about school closings, transportaion cuts, proposed cuts to programs, yet nobody talks about one of the fundamental challenges facing this and many school districts. Union influence of who is elected to the BOE and never-ending contractual obligations thanks to the Tri-borough Amendment. Parents need to learn about what directly infuences the district and speak out.
St James mom
1:07 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
You should not be amazed at parental outrage because these cuts hurt or potentially hurt our children. That being said I agree that there should be more focus on Union influences and contracts as these ridiculous demands, agreements unwillingness to have cuts or freezes is the biggest outrage that directly affects all the other cuts and decisions!!! In the private sector there have been substantial cuts, givebacks, layoffs. Many would be happy with a proposed freeze
One Opinion
2:19 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
I was not clear. I completely understand why parents would be upset. I have children in the school district too. What I don't understand is why parents just complain about what is happening to them and do not get vocal about the fundamental issues in the district that cause these changes. Hundreds of parents show up at BOE meetings making their complaints heard yet leave when the meetings get back to business. I have read many times that parents claim they don't have time to attend meetings or they should not have to attend because they trust the BOE to represent them. I would think if someone is handing over between 6k and 10k a year to the school district they would want to know how it's spent every year. Instead they show up when things are not going the way they like.
BillLongisland
5:10 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
What about the issue of Non Tax Paying "illegal aliens" who use school services ?
How many are using public resources like schools, and other Tax Paying public and private services, for "free" in this locality ?
In this area, we cannot continue to deny the fact that this is done, and to the detriment of people who pay taxes. It's the "elephant in the room".
One state, Minnesota, had the courage to find out the effect on K-12 education...
"According to data from the Pew Hispanic Center, there were an estimated 10,000 to 15,000 undocumented migrant children enrolled in K-12 education in Minnesota in 2004.
In addition, there were an estimated 5,000 U.S.-born children of undocumented migrant parents enrolled in K-12 education in 2004. These estimates include students in both public and private K-12 education.
Using the state average operating expenditures per average daily membership (ADM) for the 2003-2004 school year ($8,379), it is possible to estimate the cost of undocumented migrants to Minnesota’s K-12 public education system. These estimates are also based on data for 2000 that 94% of undocumented students and students of undocumented parents attended Minnesota’s public schools."
http://www.state.mn.us/mn/externalDocs/Administration/Report_The_Impact_of_Illegal_Immigration_on_Minnesota_120805035315_Illegal%20Immigration%20Brief%2026.pdf
Taxed Out
7:33 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
@BillLongIsland, I don't know if I can buy into your Non Tax Paying "illegal aliens" argument. Unless they are living in the woods they are either renting or own a home, in either case they are paying taxes. If they are renting an illegal apartment then the culprit is the home owner who isn't paying the appropriate taxes for their home not the renter.
robkoz
2:54 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ Taxed Out, they are living in Smithtown. Just not in droves like in Brentwood or Patchogue. A family of them lives right across the street from the Nesconset FD on Lake Ave. But they live with "other" tenants which is the problem. Where I am paying 5 digit property taxes, illegals pay a fraction of that because of multiple families living in one home. So in short, they are ripping off the school district and we are getting stuck paying the rest of their bill.
Kevin
2:54 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
In my time in Smithtown, I have seen Mills Pond, Nesaquake and West open, and then with declining enrollment, Mills Pond, Great Hollow and Nesaquake close along with East becoming a middle school and Accompsett becoming the 9th grade campus. After that, enrollment spiked and we got to where we are today. The children and parents who went through all the various closings and re-openings survived.
Enrollment is dropping which is necessitating the closing of Nesconset and will eventually lead to other schools closing. The closings might be moving faster because of budget cuts, but nothing is going to stop that nor should it. What needs to be done is configure our district so that we can go through changes in enrollment with the buildings we eventually get down too.
St James mom
5:06 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012
would agree that if enrollment truly dropping then something should be done, however I would also agree that something shoud have ability to grow/change with the times. It seems with current recommendations they will be maxing out 2 school on the East side.I have lived in this district 35 years and fortunately during my school years was not affected by the closures and reopenings. (until now) I would LOVE to see data on what is really saved long term when schools close then reopen several years later. Also I have heard from some how terrible things were with the closures so should the question really be whether the families will survive or is the a better way????
MJH
12:41 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Bill, I am still looking for data you can supply to support your statement."On that subject of school buses and their special "personalized pick up policies", it must be nice for the to get the "personalized pick up service"...with All Of Those School Buses stopping at almost Every House,"
If this is happening, we truly need to take a harder look at this. Thanks.
BillLongisland
9:50 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Well there are Rules...and there are "rules"...part 1 of 2
SCHOOL BUS SCHEDULING AND ROUTING
The District Transportation Director shall establish bus schedules and
routes under the supervision of the Assistant Superintendent for Finance and
Operations.
Authorized bus stops shall be located at convenient intervals in places
where students may embark and disembark the buses, cross highways, and await
the arrival of buses in the utmost safety allowed by road conditions.
The factors considered in determining the adequacy of a bus stop are:
1. The number of students who will be using the bus stop;
2. The age of the students;
3. The nature and amount of available space at which students may wait for
their school bus;
4. The nature of the roadway on which the students must walk to reach their
respective bus stop; and
5. The nature of the intersection or roadway passing by the bus stop.
These factors may be considered alone or in combination in evaluating the
adequacy of a bus stop.
http://www.smithtown.k12.ny.us/files/_UDCvc_/9bb81340aec1f1813745a49013852ec4/PolicyManual-9.1.11.pdf
BillLongisland
9:50 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Bus Stop Responsibilities
Parents and/or guardians, not the school district, shall be responsible to:
1. provide supervision at a bus stop used by their children; and
2. provide supervision of their children from their home to the bus stop.
The school district shall not be responsible to:
1. provide a bus stop in viewing distance of a student’s home; and
2. provide a closer bus stop to a student’s home due to individual or personal
situations relating to that student’s family circumstances (e.g., medical
condition, younger children at home, etc.)
Adoption date: March 26, 2002
http://www.smithtown.k12.ny.us/files/_UDCvc_/9bb81340aec1f1813745a49013852ec4/PolicyManual-9.1.11.pdf
BillLongisland
12:58 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
MJH, You are Not going to find it writing because as I stated...there are Rules...as in the case of the above written policies that are on the books as Official in case someone wants to sue or "make a big deal about it".
And their are "rules"...those "flexible rules" that are Not written, but in practice are openly broken and flouted by bus drivers and bus companies for one reason or another.
At my link on page 8411 titled "School Bus Scheduling and Routing", "why" do you think it's written before five items "The factors considered in determining the adequacy of a bus stop are:" and ends with the statement "These factors may be considered alone or in combination in evaluating the adequacy of a bus stop." ?
The "factors" are listed as...
1. The number of students who will be using the bus stop;
2. The age of the students;
3. The nature and amount of available space at which students may wait for
their school bus;
4. The nature of the roadway on which the students must walk to reach their
respective bus stop; and
5. The nature of the intersection or roadway passing by the bus stop.
http://www.smithtown.k12.ny.us/files/_UDCvc_/9bb81340aec1f1813745a49013852ec4/PolicyManual-9.1.11.pdf
Sounds like a loophole you could...drive a school bus through, to me ?
Ken Heard
8:07 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
The millions of Mexican illegals are here to stay. Like every immigrant before, they seek a better life. But, they are still Mexican citizens forced out of Mexico by extreme economic hardship. The US should demand that Mexico reimburse our schools, or hospitals, our legal system etc, for use of our resources over the past 20 years. The figure is in the billions, but Mexico - as a member of OPEC - is no longer a poor couintry. They have no right making us poor.
BillLongisland
8:00 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Please Ken, my Heart is breaking...but my wallet every December when I pay property taxes...Is Killing Me !
BillLongisland
8:06 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Taxed Out says ""@BillLongIsland, I don't know if I can buy into your Non Tax Paying "illegal aliens" argument."
Well, did you read the report or are you just expressing your Opinion ?
There is nothing wrong with expressing your Opinion, but if it's just your Feelings, there is Nothing that will convince you...and that's ok too :-)
Remember this when you go pay your property taxes this year.
Fred Stewart
9:07 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Ken, your assertion that Mexico should reimburse the US is rediculous... not every Hispanic is from Mexico. Further, the govt. of ANY Latin country (or any country) isn't responsible for the actions of it's citizens.
Ken Heard
9:45 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@Fred.. Mexico has failed to secure its border and should bear the cost for medical, educational and other services their citizens use in the US. I limited this to Mexican citizens because millions from this country have arrived and stayed illegally.. It has already cost the US billions over the past 20 years.
This would put an end to the argument that illegals are causing property taxes to increase. That's a red herring. The teachers union is the culprit.
scsddad
10:08 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
The personalized pickups where brought up at a board meeting Mr Ehmann said he was going to look into it because the bus drivers are suppose to only stop at bus stops not at peoples driveways. I've seen a bus stop 3 times on one block. I don't know if anything was done to correct this yet.
Pam
10:09 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Eye opening statement from Superintendet Ehmann last night. The average increase for all STA members has been 5% without a contract. It seems for the past year the administration and BoE has forgotten to clarify to the public that the teachers get both a step increase AND a column increase when a contract is expired. FYI 91% of our teachers are in college courses that meet the criteria for column movement. So 91% of our teachers have been getting a 5% increase to thier salaries since the contract expired in 2010.
Ken Heard
10:17 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ Pam. Excellent observation. Send it to The Smithtown News, The Times, Newsday and News 12..While schools close one by one and the budget gap widens, the union gets off scott free.
Bill
1:51 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Pam, Are you saying that every teacher in Smithtown has received a 5% increase?? As I am reading the contract currently the teachers are getting a step (which is money that they deserve because their salaries are spread out over 18 years) , but they can only move a column after they have finished 15 credits. Is every teacher getting 15 credits every year with a max of 60 credits. I seriously doubt it... Where did you get that 91% number, I would like to read the article..
Kevin
1:08 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
That is eye opening. I have been fortunate to get a 2.x% yearly increase, of which a good portion goes to health insurance increases, since the economy tanked.
Maybe the teachers should put away the "Working Without a Contract" pins and shirts they wear to work from time to time.
One Opinion
1:30 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Are they still wearing those pins? I have seen the shirts worn in my childrens schools and they are conveniently worn during events that the parents attend. Seems to be a standard tactic used in many districts. Does the union really think it brings them sympathy. Everyone needs to remember that the STA membership had been receiving 8%-10% increases annually until the contract expired and the STA was the one to declare impasse on contract negotiations.
BillLongisland
1:40 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
These shirtwearing teachers actually wonder "Why" Tax Payers hate Teachers and their Unions ?
Pam
4:20 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@Bill No article-Ed Ehmann made that statement at last night's meeting. It was actually a lengthy discussion. The 91% of STA member that meet the 15 credit criteria came from Superintendent Ehmann, as did the 5% average increase information. So I guess you can ask him for clarification at the next BoE meeting. Or you can even FOIL those documents.
Bill
5:35 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Thanks Pam, I wasn't sure it it was on a slide from last night. I am going to call him tomorrow and ask for clarification. I am actually glad that my Kids teachers are taking extra classes.
Ken Heard
2:17 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
@ Bill: Once again, reference Empire Center for teachers salaries in SCSD.
robkoz
5:02 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@ Pam, if what you're saying is true then even if we vote down the budget this coming year the teachers will still get their raises and property taxes will still increase. I find this disturbing.
scsddad
5:19 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Pam
Bill only hears and reads things he wants to hear. In your last post you made it clear it was a statement from Mr Ehmann
Bill
5:38 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
scsdad, I was checking to see if it was on a slide... I want accurate information and this does not sound even close to being accurate.. I am going to call tomorrow.
Ken Heard
2:24 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
@Bill: Do a little homework of your own. Reference teachers salaries on the Empire Center site. It provides the salary for each teacher in SCSD !!!
One Opinion
6:21 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Did you know… Teachers have the potential to earn THREE different types of salary increases each year of their contract? An annual cost of living increase, a “step” increase, and a “column transfer” increase for continuing education and professional development credits. In any given year of the contract this represents about a 7-8% raise each and every year, which is compounded. In addition some teachers are eligible for longevity bonuses of $5,100., depending on length of service within the district. (Source: Article XX, STA contract and BoE meeting 2/7/2011)
http://litaxes.blogspot.com/2011/05/smithtown-long-island-teachers.html
Pam
6:21 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
Bill most of this data is FOILable, that's the best way to get the facts. Official documents hold more factual information. Check out the Ed-1 Record and Retention Schedule. It will list all documents that you as a citizen can access. It is a very helpful document. Bill you are right this should all be on a PowerPoint or white paper, unless the SCSD would prefer the community to be unaware.
Bill
7:46 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
One Opinion, Serious question what do you think a teacher should earn? I am curious for your answer
One Opinion
10:10 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@Bill my issue is not so much with the salaries. I think if you have earned a Masters degree you should earn a fair salary. I don't think teachers salaries are too much out of line even in respect to private industry. However, remember that those teachers work 180 days a year, pay only 15% of their healthcare cost, receive salary increases every year just for being in the job with no additional workload, responsibilities or perfomance reviews, retire with generous pensions and lastly are not held accountable for job performance due to tenure.
So, to answer your question, if you're going to pay a teacher on average $90K a year with some teachers earning into the $100K plus area, then the benefits better get cut down. Civil Service benefits were put in place to compensate for low salaries. The unions in this state have hijacked the system as well as taxpayers money to create the insane system we are dealing with today. They have brainwashed the communities to believe that if you even question the compensation you are heartless and don't care about the teachers or the children.
Ken Heard
2:12 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
@Bill Reference Empire Center. This site lists the salaries for each teacher in the Smithtown district. If this doesn't open your eyes, nothing will.
Pam
7:49 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
@Bill here is some better clarification on costs.
Average steps are 3.6 % - backing out those at the top getting stipends the actual cost is 3.9% , for STEP only
The rest 1.2% is related to pension and health benefit increases
Total increase in cost 11.5 million is 5% of budget - almost 100% of that increase is salary related
** So I apoligize for not being completely accurate-like the administration always is with us. I just try and correct my inaccurate statements as quickly as I can.
Have a great night.
Bill
8:23 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012
sometimes I don't even think the admin gets the numbers correct or even the BOE. LOL.. Pam I see the numbers but the problem is the system not the teachers or the union. I am a CPA and trust me I would love the teachers work day but I would not want their salary. Teachers deserve to make money and I feel that the salary schedule is a positive for the district (not the teachers) if you understand the point of the salary schedule. My guess is that some of you do not understand it.. If I was a teacher I would just want my top salary right ( say 5 or 6 years the private world) away not spread out over 18 years. That is the purpose of the schedule to spread it out and slow down the teachers earnings positive for the district.
Ken Heard
2:20 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
@Bill Reference Empire Center for teachers salaries. .
robkoz
1:31 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
Just found out that every child in Brentwood middle school and elementary schools are getting free breakfast. The rationale behind it is that some study was done and they came to the conclusion that kids that eat breakfast do better on tests. Last time I checked you had to actually study to do well on tests. Didn't realize eating makes you smarter.......
Let me know when all of our kids in Smithtown get free breakfast. Especially since we actually pay our taxes.
Pam
5:01 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
@Bill- well aware of how teacher contracts work both of my parents were NYSUT members, between the 2 of them they had close to 60 years of teaching here on LI. So yes I value high quality teachers, unfortunately as you said the system is broken. That's why it is even more important for the public to understand all the issues facing our children in the public education system. Considering how large our district is and how large our budget is our district should have a multi year plan that they work off of. The NYS comptroller's have been saying it for a few years now, but alas it is not a mandate so districts do not want to do it. Yet a plan would enable us to look down the road to see if what we (as a district) want can actually be acheived without putting us into a fiscal tailspin. IE: newer computers, more virtual courses, more AP and IB courses, and most of all keeping what we currently have! Mr. Saggase has been asking the admin to do this for years, yet here we are.
Bill
8:47 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
Ken,
A teacher is not allowed to make 100,000 a year after 18 YEARS of service.. Most of the handfull of teachers and admin making over 100,000 a year have atleast 15 or 16 years. I know I make more than that in only 8 years. Ken, what do you make and how long did it take you to make over 100,000. Keep reading the papers and listening to false statements. I agree that they only pay only 14.5% of Health Insurance. Times are changing,
Ken Heard
10:42 am on Friday, February 10, 2012
@Bill you have to do some homework of your own. Reference the STA contract via Empire Center. It has FIVE salary grids, one or each year of the contract.Each year represents higher salaries. For example, the first salary grid shows $42,000 as a teachers' stating salary. The fifth grid shows $51,000 as a starting salary. Sill newer grids will be added once the new contract is finalized. When coupled with cost of living, automatic grid increases and professional advancement, teachers are making out like bandits. Bill, do some homework before saying " show me". You are in New York, not Missouri.
Ken Heard
12:04 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@Bill. You focus only on direct, not indirect, compensation. Indirect compensation includes the cost of health and retirement benefits. The current copay for a doctor's visit is only $15. This at a time when corporations are either switching to high deductible HSA plans or traditional health insurance plans with deductibles and coinsurance applied to in network benefits. The true cost for the current medical plan is probably in excess of $600 per single employee per month and in excess of $1,300 per month per family. The cost for the pension plan , which everyone admits is extremely generous, must be out of sight.
Bill
12:43 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
actually Ken i had a conversation with a few teachers at my son school the other day and their copay is $20.00. Just wanted you to have a REAL FACT..
Bob
4:21 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Wow Bill. I can't believe there's someone else out there that actually understands that a salary schedule was an invention of EMPLOYERS to save them money. It's not an advantage to the employees. I'm a labor attorney and I have to try to explain that concept all the time to my clients (management) and to community members. Unfortunately, there are too many people out there who either don't understand or choose not to understand.
Ken sounds like he has a personal ax to going, and I'm not talking about how he doesn't like his taxes.
Ken Heard
1:37 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@ Bill: Both the teachers and yourself should click Empire Center and download the STA Contract( 2005-2010). On page 35, it clearly states the office visit co pay is $15, effective July 1, 2006.
Your groundless sarcasm is not appreciated. I got my information from the STA contract, not hearsay from " a few teachers". It is possible that the co-pay was changed during the contract period of 2005-2010, but I could find no documentation supporting the same. I check my facts carefully before I speak. You should do likewise .
In any event, a $20 copay is still way out of whack with the trend in private industry. See my comments above
Bill
2:00 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Well, You should get your facts straight. It's people like you who get the community going. Yes, the co-pay was changed to $20 a while back. I get the feeling you do not understand contract language. I got my answer from the actual people paying their copayment. I am in the private industry and my copayment is $20. Not out of whack.
Ken Heard
10:40 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
@Bob.You don't even know me, yet you have reached the conclusion that I have a hidden agenda - in this case, an ax to grind. Bob, the psychic network infomercials terminated on 9/11. You're an attorney, not a psychic. Don't make accusations that that can't stand the light of day.
In a recent letter to the Smithtown News, I analyzed the salary grid and the five schedules in the STA contract. In writing this letter I used an essay derived from the Empire Center called " The Trouble with Triborough". , which I used as a guide in analyzing the STA contract.
Please read this article and use your skills as a labor attorney in determining whether I am right or wrong. And in the future, please steer clear of silly, groundless accusations. I'm just a person who sees a wrong and is trying to make it right. I'm not running for office, but I do hope my letters arouse the curiosity of trained professionals such as yourself. This is a good school district that has lost its way. . It desperately needs help - today - from people such as yourself.
If not us, who? If not now, when ?
BillLongisland
4:47 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
In concept, it's legal "extortion" by the "public employee" Labor Unions ?
Ken Heard
2:13 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@ Bill. Once again, don't rely on hearsay. Reference your point with the written agreement raising the co-pay to $20.As President Reagan used to say " Trust but verify". At this point, I was able to verify my comment, you were not.
Ken Heard
3:51 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@ Bob. My observation that I was able to verify my facts and you were not cannot possibly agitate anyone ( " ...get the community going" ). I am raising questions and backing them up with written documentation. You might not like what you hear, but, please, don't shoot the messenger..
Ken Heard
3:53 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I said Bob, I meant Bill . Mea Culpa
Bill
4:42 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Ken,
I am going to get your answer on Monday when I research and get the answer for you. I know that the STA copay is $20 and not out of whack I have many friends who also pay $20 along with myself. What do you pay???
One Opinion
6:32 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@ Bill When you research your co-pay questions ask about the the co-pay reimburstments that are paid for from the STA Benefit Fund. That would be the $384,000 fund that the school district contractually funds and maintains in the budget .
Bill
7:56 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I am totally aware of the Benefit Fund. Thanks.
One Opinion
10:22 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@Bob, @Bill I realize this thread has gotten off topic but what are your solutions? You accuse people on this forum of having agenda's yet we are simply taxpayers and parents who see an unsustainable system. We point out the flaws, however they may have come about, and ask for change. The employee obligations of this district and many others are becoming a burden that will effect the quality of schools for years to come. Do any of you really belive that the kids in school today will be able to afford to live here in 20 years? Property taxes have doubled in ten years as direct relalationship to the school budget. I think the average teachers time in the job is about 15 years. What does that time bomb of increases look like down the road? We have a teachers union in this district who's only public statements regarding the contract has been a newspaper article about how unfair everything is, and an embarrasing rally of their membership at a BOE meeting. We have many fabulous teachers in this district and this selfish negotiation process by the STA leadership is creating much animosity throughout the community. It's a terrible thing. So tell us, what are your positions. Are your family members part of this system? Because if my spouse was in line for an $80K pension and paid health benefits for life at retirement, then I don't think I would have a problem paying $9000 in school taxes.
robkoz
11:00 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I'm laughing at all the posts here because there are people posting like they can actually make a difference. If micromanaging the BOE makes people feel better about paying insane property taxes then by all means enjoy. But the reality is this runaway train is out of control and the only way stopping it is a big crash. The young RN's I work with keep asking me for advise. If they should stay at home and save, rent or buy a house and I tell them the same thing every time. Move out of New York State before it's too late! There's no future left here for them thanks to school taxes and every other tax that our libtard goverment keeps coming up with. Even for the people that actually make a decent salary. I only have to squeak by 4 more years then I'm gonna sell my house to as many illegals as I can. Let's see how the school district deals with more kids and less money after that.
Bill
12:51 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
One Opinion - You really need to get your facts straight, I will answer your question when you stop posting such false statements and get the community going. What teachers have PAID health benefits for life, not Smithtown teachers.. Smithtown is a huge community, but I really only see 5 or 6 people posting. So what animosity is the STA leadership creating. From the teachers I have spoken with they are very united. What would you like the STA leadership to say. Every time he speaks the same people twist his words around. I read in the papers that the STA is willing to help, let's hope that the settle soon. I have no family members part of the system, and I do pay 10,000 a year in taxes but I do not blame the teachers...
Ken Heard
8:21 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@Bill and one Opinion: : It might be a good idea to get both your observations in writing.. I am sure some written resolution exists..A written document negates any future misunderstanding.. In your case, One Opinion, you could use this moment to update $384,000 union reserve fund number. I am curious. If there is such a fund, where does the money come from?
Bill, you asked about my own health insurance, I am a sole owner who is not permitted to take advantage of 2 to 50 life community rates. I am covered by HIP where the co pay is $30 for a primary care doctor and $50 for a specialist. The annual deductible for the drug card is $300.
With regards to in hospital charges, my in network out of pocket is several thousand dollars per year. My monthly premium is $592..
I need the drug card more than anything to treat my Parkinson's desease and heart condition.
I am an insurance broker who sells group health insurance, so I now that when you say a $20 co pay is the norm, I can tell you that you are incorrect.The new norm is either $40 or $50 copays for primary care and specialist or 30/50. . On groups of less than 51 lives, Empire requires, the employee to pay 35% of the cost for non preferred name brand drugs up to a maximum payment on his part of $350 per prescription.. Empire offers other prescription drug plans but this is the most generous.
This is the new reality. And it is not getting any better.
One Opinion
9:23 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@Ken Heard STA Benefit Fund $360,000 budgeted for 2011-2012. Page 16
http://www.smithtown.k12.ny.us/files/_UDCoE_/1065a0809f570fb93745a49013852ec4/2011-05-02-1112PROPOSEDBUDGET.pdf
One Opinion
11:36 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@robkoz You should consider Alabama when you leave. They should have cleared out all their "illegals" by then. Perfect for you.
robkoz
12:02 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
LMAO! Is that the best you got?
One Opinion
5:02 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@Bill We will have to agree to disagree. You clearly do not see any issues with the current school budget or the crippling contractual obligations that face this school district and most districts in NY state. You are correct, nobody in the community is concerned about these issues except the five or six that post on this website. So why are you here. To tell us how wrong we are? I believe the administration and the BOE fully understand that the district cannot afford another contract like the one that expired almost two years ago. They also understand that a back-ended contract has the potential to be devastating to the district. You realize that the STA went to impasse almost immediately after the contract expired. Why? Because they can continue to get a 5% annual increase every year with or without a contract. Even if the district can't afford it (Thank you Gov. Cuomo for the tax cap).
As for the retirement health benfits, I incorrectly quoted the Supertintendents retirement health benefits (full paid) not the teachers. I'm not sure what the teachers get but I would guess it's not a bad deal.
scsddad
6:37 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Bill, there's people that have animosity for the STA leadership but don't post because they think posting is a waste of time. By the way I only see 2 people posting that is in favor of the STA
robkoz
11:21 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Just out of curiosity, are the contract negotiations always under the table between politicians and the union or is there any transparancy to them? Also, is there a way to view their contract since salaries and benefits are paid for through property taxes?
Pam
7:18 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
@robkoz-A member of the audience asked if the district will post the MOA (memorandum of Agreement) before the union membership votes on it. Yes legally they can do it-but will they?? Superintendent Ehmann did not respond yes or no to that question of will they.
As far as the healthcare benefits go- I do not have the contract in front of me but, I believe STA members pay for 14.5% of their premium. However- they do have an STA benefits fund that the district pays several thousand per member to fund-this fund is used to help cover the STA members co-pays, it has been in the last 2 contracts.
One Opinion
9:07 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
The district was paying 90% of healthcare costs. They were negotiated down on a scale in the last contract (2005). They are at 85% as of 2009 so members were only paying 10% in 2005 and had a one percent decrease a year and only in the last year did it get to 15% contribution.
Districts healthcare contributions:
Effective July 1, 2006- 88%
Effective July 1, 2007- 87%
Effective July 1, 2008- 86%
Effective July 1, 2009- 85%
BillLongisland
7:49 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Here's a place that you can find past and current employment contracts in pdf format, union contracts and individual pensions, annual wages, etc, for school district employees, teachers...
For example, here is the employment contract for Edward L. Ehman for July 1,2007 to June 20, 2011...
http://qvs.visiblegovernment.us/seethroughNY.net/contracts/school-contracts/Smithtowns063011.pdf
Ken Heard
10:04 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
One Opinion, you are the King of Epiphanies. It is a disturbing revelation to learn that such a fund exists , not only to cover the medical copay, but to pay unreimbursed expenses for dental and vision care. One question: The maximum calendar year benefit is $200 per member. Does this max cover only the employee or does it apply to each member of his family. In other words, if we have an employee with a spouse and three children, is the maximum benefit $200 for the employee-member only or $1,000 for the entire family. In a nutshell, I am asking the definition of "member". The reimbursement form makes it clear that the entire family benefits, but if " member"means only the employee, then the most the family will receive during the calendar year is $200. If "member" applies to each person in the family, then spouse and children are entitled to a max of $200 each
There are also teachers whose spouses work for the same school district.. Are they entitled to double reimbursement ?
Hammer
7:01 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
I don't understand advising people to move out of New York. Do you think that the financial crisis is limited to New York? How about Florida where there are entire communities boarded up? How about California or Arizona, would you advise someone to move there? Where are you telling the RNs your advising to go? The grass is always greener on the other side. Instead of advising people to leave, maybe you should take a look at how many people leave Long Island and come back.
robkoz
7:43 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Sorry but no one I'm aware of that has left LI come back to LI. Why would anyone come back to high mortgages and high property taxes? It defies logic and common sense. Oh, and the grass is greener on the other side. It's called North Carolina. I've lost 4 RN's and 1 NNP because of NC and they're not coming back. Not to mention certain areas in other states that I've been researching.
The mass influx of people that came to LI between 2000-2008 got totally scammed in my opinion. Long Island WAS the place to raise a family till the real estate agencies, unions and NYS got greedy. What's going on now? It's called an exodus. Every block I turn down in Smithtown has at least 1 For Sale sign.
Got to laugh at you a bit here. Don't know what you think LI has to offer anyone growing up here. Working their tail off for 5 digit property taxes for an overprice home? Is that what you think the future for Long Island's youth should be here for? That's pretty selfish in my opinion.
Pam
7:46 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
@Hammer perhaps you are not a small business owner that employess 25 or more.but it is becoming harder and harder to stay open for business. We are trying for the sake of all of our employees to choose to remain open for business, we are keenly aware that their mortgage, car payment, credit card payment, are connected to them receiving a paycheck, but there is only so much a State or government can take before a business decides to say NO I will go. My husband and I are both born and bred NY'ers business has been in Smithtown for over 60 years, but there comes a time when you say -enough I can't afford to stay. And the employees do what????? We try and sleep at night with this reality.
Hammer
7:56 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Long island is a great place to live. Times are tough here but they are tough everywhere. There will always be opportunity here. We live a train ride away from the greatest city in the world. There is nothing like a summer on Long Island with our beaches and what we have to offer. If moving to the sticks in North Carolina is the answer for you then by all means go ahead. Trust me you will be back. Long Island is not perfect by any means, and is in a fiscal mess, but everywhere else has the same problems. They just don't have the great things Long Island has to offer. North Carolina and Florida and what not may sound great, but living there is different then visiting.
robkoz
8:51 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
I don't think you're looking at the big picture here Hammer. What jobs are here for LI's youth to afford a $300k home with an $7000 annual property tax bill? And I'm low balling those numbers. I just read in Newsday that school districts are going to be raising taxes greater than 2% again! Why do schools need more money?! What have they been doing with the money we've been giving them for over 15 years?
So I ask again Hammer, what do LI's youth have to look forward too here?
Ken Heard
8:21 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
@ Hammer, Pam et al. Interesting sidebar. , but the other comments raised earlier in this electronic public forum were , in my opinion, more substantial and topical.. I am not packing my bags as long as there are fighters like One Opinion, Pam, etc out there.
Hammer
9:03 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Look around at some of the areas that people flocked too from around the country only a few years ago and how they are doing. Las Vegas, Orlando, Phoenix, etc..., they were the hotspots only a few years ago. They have entire neighborhoods boarded up. We have a lot of for sale signs here and things are not great here but from my perspective they are better here then then elsewhere. I don't think leaving Long Island is the answer. I think that is bad advice to give somebody.
robkoz
10:11 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
There's more than a few places to go other than the handful of places you keep repeating over and over again. I've been told by my past co-workers that they made the right move especially after hearing what has happened here. No offense but unless you give me a better reason why people shouldn't leave other than using scare tactics compared to real life here, your argument doesn't hold much water. Especially your comment about people leaving LI then coming back.
robkoz
2:54 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Hey Hammer, here's a good recent article in Newsday that pretty much nails it down:
http://www.newsday.com/opinion/oped/filler-why-they-leave-long-island-1.3527498